Why pick Obama or Hillary?

Many people will vote for Hillary because she would be America's first Female President. Many other people will vote for Obama because he would be America's first black President.

I've been called a sexist for refusing to vote for Hillary. If I don't vote for her, I'm against women. I've been called a racist for refusing to vote for Obama. If I don't vote for her, I want to oppress black folks.

So, by their logic, I must vote for a candidate based on the color of his skin, or for the type of genitalia she possesses. Well, I am not voting for genitals, and I am not voting for skin.

I am not even voting for a Party. I am voting for an ideology, a philosophy, not for a group. Both Parties have the wrong ideas for America. Both Parties want to perpetuate the same mistakes, and I cannot go along with it.

I would be a racist if I voted for a man based on his skin color. I would be a sexist if I voted only for one type of gender. Since I am doing neither, I cannot be either.

If Ron Paul was a black woman, then I would be casting my vote for the first black woman President. Yet, Ron Paul just happens to be a white male. I chose Ron because of his ideas, not because he's white and male. And I firmly believe that all those people who vote for skin and genitals need to wake up and start learning economics and politics.

This dumbing down of America works in favor of the people entrenched in the current political power structure, who need to perpetuate this system for their own benefit. Their benefit is not our benefit. Wake up, America! Start studying Austrian economics. From there, start learning some real politics, and start questioning Big Brother's propaganda. The best consumer is a smart consumer, and likewise the best voter is an educated one.

Hillary Isn't Crazy, Is She?

THE MANY FACES OF HILLARY CLINTON

You sassin' me, woman? Don't you sass me, y'hear!


I'm a socialist zombie, and I'm going to eat you!


Hi! I'm Scare-llary!


I look down on free-market nonsense!

GASP! I used to be a Republican???

Hey America! Sit on these and spin!

When I'm der Fuhrer, you will heil me, heil Hitler-y!


Das ist true! Karl's lips don't move!


BOO! I'm a socialist bunny rabbit!


Hippie-kai-yay!


This portrait is called, the "Arkansas Hill-Bill-ies"


Billary, then, and now.


More manic than depressive.

Feminista-Fashionista.


Future Marxist/Femi-NAZI in the making.

Free-market ideas? CRINGE!

Truth, Justice, and the American Way? BORING!

You mean the old lady realized "Free Healthcare" isn't really free? Oh, shit!

If Hillary becomes President...

1984: BIG SISTER IS WATCHING

War is Peace

Perpetual war for perpetual peace.
We'll fight them over there, so we won't have to fight them over here.

Freedom is Slavery

Less liberty = More security.

Ignorance is Strength

The economic ignorance of the masses is the strength of the Party.

Say hello to the Food Police!

An article in the Monday, February 4, 2008 edition of the Boston Herald, entitled, "All you can't eat: Bill would keep fatties from dining out", stated that "Health-conscious legislators in Mississippi have filed a bill that would bar restaurants from serving meals to obese people." With all the political-correctness malarkey shoved down everyone's throat over the years, where 'sensitivity' training was force-fed to unwitting employers and employees, in various business, for making the mindless mistake of saying the wrong words to people with a chip on their shoulders, who then pretended to be 'offended' in order to file phony lawsuits, here we have an elected representative saying some people are too fat to be fed. The article continues, "'State Rep. Ted Mayhill (R-Southaven), told the Jackson Clarion-Ledger he doesn't expect the tough-love bill to pass, but he's hoping to 'call attention to the problem. No one's doing anything about it', Mayhall said. 'They just keep on going to the buffets and eating.'" Good Lord! Obese people have the nerve to go out and eat! Why, there oughta be a law! Oops! Why, here is one right now! Why do Americans insist on electing these mental midgets to positions of power? We give control freaks handcuffs, and they go on and shakle us with them. Isn't it about time we stop this madness and vote for Liberty instead? Vote for Ron Paul for President!

Can We Stop the Insanity?

How many elections have come and gone? How many Presidential candidates have claimed that they will make America great again, yet have failed? How many campaign promises have been made and broken? How many regimes have relied on the same statist principles to run our country, and have made a mess? Are you tired of reading so many questions? Are you tired of answering them? Are you sick and tired of politics yet?

"Insanity [is] doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results. " Albert Einstein, (attributed) US (German-born) physicist (1879 - 1955)

Are our leaders guilty of insanity? Or are we, the People, guilty of insanity for choosing the same type of politicians over and over again and expecting different results?

Shouldn't we end the insanity?

How about now? How about right now?

There are two ways to stop the insanity that has become American politics. Either we break the cycle of electing stupid people as leaders by choosing a different politician with different ideas, based on a different mindset that long ago worked for America to make this country great. Or, we should break the cycle of electing stupid people by not voting at all. Stay home and don't cast a vote--any vote. No one. Period.

The second option is not so good. If not one single American voted, somehow, someone would get elected by default, and most likely it would be the same type of stupid politician with the same stupid ideas who upholds the current stupid power structure by perpetuating this stupidity for another four years.

So why don't we try something different for a change? Why don't we elect a different kind of politician--one who understands real economics and wants to go back to doing the time-tested and proven things that once made America the greatest nation in the history of the human race? Shouldn't we at least try to do something different? Shouldn't we all at least try to stop this insanity?

Forget the Republican Party. It is fascist. Fascism is un-American. Forget the Democratic Party. It is socialist. Socialism is un-American. Why don't we give peace and liberty a chance? These are truly American characteristics. Why don't we give capitalism and the free market a chance (and no, we have never been a purely capitalist country. Partial capitalism has made America great. Let's try the full, laissez-faire version to make it better.) Capitalism is an American characteristic. Let's restore the Constitution, which is the only document that keeps us safe from the tyrrany of government. Bring America the great back again, shall we?

Won't you even try something totally different?

Here is how: Vote for Ron Paul for President. The Republicans have failed America. The Democrats have failed America. Let's put a Libertarian in the Oval Office. How much worse off could we be, since we're already scraping the bottom of the barrel?

Vote for Ron Paul for President of the United States of America!

Uh-oh! Is Someone's Party Feeling Threatened?

There is a website called http://ronpaulexposed.com/, which is obviously an anti-Ron Paul site. It's claims are questionable. I have answered these claims myself, but for a more detailed rebuttal, go see the http://ronpaulunexposed.com/ website for a complete refutation. Boy, the lengths some people will go to to cover the asses of their fascist leaders!

Statement: Ron Paul thinks we'd be safer without the CIA

Bill Maher - I would feel pretty naked without the CIA

Ron Paul - You'd feel naked, but you'd be a lot safer because you'd be less likely to be attacked by terrorists.

My Answer: First, Bill Maher is an asshole and a Party line hack, so anything he says is questionable. Second, Ron Paul is correct, and here is why: the CIA is responsible for much of the American-sponsored terrorism around the world, as the arm and the sword of the American Foreign Policy that has resulted in the blowback of 9/11. If it weren't for the CIA, America could not have been able to do all the rotten, unethical, immoral things that have angered the fanatics and provoked them to strike back at us on Tuesday, September 11, 2001. If the owner of RonPaulExposed.com finds Ron Paul's statement appalling, then he needs to stop drinking the government kool-aid and start looking for the truth; unless of course he is a Party line hack, like Bill Maher, in which case he's hopeless because when Big Brother tells him 2+2=5, then 2+2=5.


Statement: Paul has voted against funding our troops while in combat.

My Answer: Ron Paul is a non-interventionist, and as such, he believes that we should keep our nose out of other people's business. This includes the end of unconstitutional warmongering, empire-building, nation-building, etc. Ron Paul supports the troops by vowing to bring them home immediately, and not just the ones in Iraq, but all of them around the world. There is no better support that a President can give to our troops than to bring them home to the safe and loving arms of their families. The RonPaulExposed.com owner would rather keep funding a war the majority of Americans are against, with taxpayer money Americans would be better off pocketing, in order to keep Americans soldiers in harm's way and watch them be maimed, crippled and killed. Maybe the website owner should be the one exposed!


Statement: Ron Paul is a political opportunist.
*In 1988 Ron Paul ran for president as a Libertarian, despite being a life long Republican. Now he's running for president as a Republican. Seems he runs on the side that seems the most expedient at the time.

My Answer: According to this logic, Ron Paul was a lifelong Republican who ran as a Libertarian because the Libertarian Party was the side that was most expedient at the time. Does anyone really believe that the Libertarian Party had a snowball's chance in a furnace of cranking out a Presidential frontrunner? It seems that the website owner doesn't have enough facts about history to be making such bold statements. Ron Paul is a lifelong Libertarian who did indeed run on the Libertarian platform. Paul has a better chance of being elected as a Republican, because America is not very familiar with the Libertarian Party or its philosophy, thanks to the propaganda against it by the two major Parties. What matters is that Ron Paul holds the same beliefs as a Republican as he has held as a Libertarian. As a matter of fact, Ron Paul's philosophy about politics and economics run diammetrically contrary to the views held by the Neocons, who have adopted the same Statist mindset as their Socialist Democrat counterparts. Ron paul today is the Ron Paul of yesterday. There is no flip-flopping here.


Statement: Ron Paul believes in conspiracy theories.
*Paul believes Bush is determined to impose martial law through a bird-flu scare.
"They're determined to have martial law."
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/may2007/240507ontherecord.htm

*Paul believes Bush will concoct something to scare the American people.
"I think freedom's been sliding for a long time and it got a lot worse after 9/11 and I'm always afraid of some concocted event that will scare the American people"http://educate-yourself.org/cn/ronpaulwarnsofUSdictatorship11apr07.shtml

My Answer: The phrase "Conspiracy Theory" has aquired an undeserved negative connotation. This negative connotation works in favor of the government, because it can be used to discredit anyone who holds a view different from the Party propaganda. A conspiracy is nothing more than the act of several individuals in unison planning or conspiring to attain a specific goal. A conspiracy theorist is an observant person who sees through the government imposed blinders to the truth and states his beliefs about it. The term "conspiracy theorist" does not mean crazy, insane or lunatic. This is something the government wants everyone to believe. If the government says 2+2=5, and I believe otherwise, I am a "conspiracy nut." The website owner seems to believe that our dear Leader would never impose martial law on America. Time will tell, now won't it? I'd like to hear him explain why he believes the government would be against having ultimate power and control.

Statement: Paul leads Houston area in Pork\Earmark spending
http://chip91.wordpress.com/2007/08/19/ron-pauls-personal-pork-projects/

My Answer: The name of the blog is "Conservatives and Libertarians United Against Ron Paul - Watching what Ron Paul does. Not what he says." Obviously, Ron Paul's Libertarian philosophy goes against the statist-minded insanity of the Neocon website owner. I may be wrong but I didn't see any comments from Libertarians on the page. Go see the blog, read the main post and the 16 replies, and judge for yourself if Ron Paul is wrong.

The Great Distraction

The left/right dichotomy is designed to limit the scope of choice in the public awareness. The State embraces and promulgates the ideological contradiction to create the illusion of actual competition by different means for different ends, yet the ends of both poles are equivalent, and are to the benefit and the liking of the State.

And now for a commercial:

A man and his one-trick pony perform a song and dance. They groove to the rhythm of "The Hustle", while singing the "Star-Spangled Banner."

And now, back to our show:

The greater the contradiction, the more believable the illusion of potentially different ends by the different means, and the greater the illusion of freedom of dissenting views. It is the great distraction, which rivets all eyes on the play, to avoid the viewing of the bigger picture, where the ends are shown to be harmoniously in sync. The illusion flitters away before the eyes like an evaporating dream upon awakening, when one notices that any other ideology not similarly labeled as the wings produces clearly different ends by totally different means. Then one sees the distraction clearly, and the commercial's true meaning shows itself.

And now for another commercial:

Two hands cover a mouth, and the voice of reason is muffled.

Ah, yes. This one now looks familiar.